|
November 2002
New committee to provide advice on biotechnology
An advisory committee headed by the University of Melbournes
Dr Christopher Cordner will provide independent advice to the Government
on the social and ethical issues of biotechnology.
The formation of the Victorian Biotechnology Ethics Advisory Committee
is a direct response to community concern and was flagged in Victorias
Strategic Plan for Biotechnology.
The Committee will provide strategic advice relating to the ethics
of gene technology and novel biotechnology as it applies to Victoria.
It will offer independent advice on the ethical aspects of specific
policy positions under development at the national and State level.
The Committee is supported by the Department of Human Services,
which has also set up a dedicated unit to manage the State regulatory
system and act as a community contact point for the State Government.
Dr Cordner said the issues to be dealt with by the committee were
extremely complex and the members needed to be aware of community
concerns.
There has been significant recent media coverage of biotechnology
and gene technology, keeping these issues in the public arena and
on many peoples minds, Dr Cordner said.
These technologies will increasingly impact on our lives
and the community wants assurances that Government is regulating
the development of this technology in a transparent and accountable
way.
The first meeting of the committee provided members with detailed
background information on the national gene technology regulatory
framework and began the development of a comprehensive Victorian
Code of Ethical Practice for Biotechnology.
The committee is made up of four lay people and others with expertise
in the areas of community advocacy, biomedicine, applied ethics,
religion, animal welfare, agriculture, environment and law.
Members come from both metropolitan and rural Victoria.
They are Dr Christopher Cordner, Chair, Senior Lecturer in Moral
Philosophy, University of Melbourne; Dr Dimitrios Bairaktaris, layman
with experience in the information technology sector; Richard Reilly,
layman with knowledge of federal regulatory environment; Kim Sweetnam,
laywoman with experience in rural media; Lizabeth McNeil, laywoman
working with intellectually disabled persons in the Warrnambool
area; Elaine Nyberg, community advocacy; Ainsley Newsom, a qualified
bioethicist with experience in applied ethics; Assistant Professor
Marjorie Dunlop, Chair of the Department of Human Services Human
Research Ethics Committee with knowledge of medical research; Aviva
Kipen, minister of religion; Meg Parkinson, a farmer in South Gippsland
and a member of a university Animal Ethics Committee; Veronica McGowan,
public relations consultant; Professor E.W.R. (Snow) Barlow, Head,
School of Agricultural and Food Systems, Institute of Land and Food
Resources, the University of Melbourne; Dr Peter Temple-Smith, environmental
advocacy; Mark Richardson, lawyer; Dr Robert Hall, Director, Public
Health, Department of Human Services, Chief Health Officer and Chair
of the Biotechnology Safety and Ethics Interdepartmental Committee.
|